Project partners

Project
Partners

Supported
By

Project Partners

Supported by

Studies

Ecological studies

Understanding Connections

Habitat Use

To better understand the habitat preferences of the Marsh Fritillary in dry environments, we conduct extensive mapping of the butterfly, its larval stages, and host plants. Our focus includes:

  1. Habitat Use and Colonization Dynamics:
    Examining how the butterfly utilizes its habitat and the dynamics of colonization within the studied metapopulation.
  2. Identification of Key Reproductive Sites:
    Identifying priority reproductive sites for the butterfly at the habitat level.
  3. Analysis of Environmental Parameters:
    Analyzing various environmental factors to gain a deeper understanding of the butterfly’s habitat use.
  4. Targeted Conservation Strategies:
    Using our findings to guide targeted conservation efforts for the Marsh Fritillary, including selecting areas for restoration and determining subsequent management practices.


Our research results play a crucial role in the selection of restoration sites and the development of effective management strategies to ensure the conservation of this endangered species.

Habitat
Scabiosa lucida
Succcisa pratensis

Functional Connectivity

As a typical metapopulation species, the individual local populations of the Marsh Fritillary are connected through occasional exchanges of individuals. This leads to dynamics of colonization and extinction events between different habitat patches. The more isolated the local populations are, the more vulnerable they are to extinction events.

The key to the persistence of these populations lies in how well they are connected across the landscape matrix—i.e., the surrounding non-habitat areas with their respective spatial resistances between occupied patches. To better assess the status of the Marsh Fritillary metapopulation and to guide the selection of restoration areas, we have determined the Functional Connectivity of all studied patches.

For this purpose, different land types (e.g., habitat, other grasslands, forests, buildings) were assigned spatial resistances. Easily traversable areas, such as grasslands, were given low resistance values, while difficult obstacles (e.g., forests) were assigned high resistance values.

By calculating the cost distance between two habitat patches—i.e., the effort required to move from one patch through the landscape matrix to another—we can now evaluate how well our study areas are connected to surrounding occupied habitat patches. This data provides insight into the connectivity of our study sites and helps inform conservation strategies for maintaining and improving metapopulation dynamics.

Extinction Debt

The fragmentation of montane grassland habitats has led to increasing threats to biodiversity in Germany. Besides habitat quality, factors such as habitat size and isolation are crucial for the survival of species in fragmented landscapes. However, not all taxa respond equally quickly to reduced habitat size and increasing isolation. Many groups of species experience a time-lagged extinction, known as extinction debt.

To assess the presence of extinction debt, one method is to compare both historical and current landscape structures (e.g., the size of habitat patches) as explanatory factors for current species occurrences. If the current occurrences of the Marsh Fritillary are better explained by historical rather than current landscape structures, it generally indicates the presence of extinction debt.

For this purpose, aerial images from 1953, 1989, and 2020 were digitized and georeferenced. Preliminary results indicate that the “Buckelwiesen” area was not only larger in the past but also more frequently connected. The loss of these nutrient-poor grasslands has been dramatic.